04/29/2026 WCFFB
COMPOSITE RPI RATINGS
.500+ RATED TEAMS ONLY
WHERE THE ‘25-’26 WOMEN’s COLLEGE FLAG FOOTBALL
SEASON STANDS TODAY
-VARSITY TEAMS ONLY-
BASED ON RESULTS AS REPORTED BY CONFERENCES and athletic departments
Rank Team Final RPI
1 Warner (FL) 0.9393
2 Milligan (TN) 0.9384
3 Ottawa (KS) 0.8955
4 Marymount (VA) 0.8858
5 Eastern University (PA) 0.8518
6 Aurora (IL) 0.8484
7 Florida Gateway (FL) 0.8382
8 Ventura (CA) 0.8358
9 Villa Maria (NY) 0.8347
10 Keiser (FL) 0.8327
11 Nevada State (NV) 0.8274
12 Hope International (CA) 0.8248
13 Roberts Wesleyan (NY) 0.8245
14 Baker (KS) 0.8158
15 Ferrum (VA) 0.8087
16 Gallaudet (D.C.) 0.7954
17 Kansas Wesleyan (KS) 0.7927
18 Penn State Harrisburg (PA) 0.7794
19 Saint Francis (IN) 0.7778
20 Saddleback (CA) 0.7759
21 Wallace State CC (AL) 0.7693
22 Daytona State (FL) 0.761
23 Life (GA) 0.7515
24 Immaculata (PA) 0.7433
25 Lindsey Wilson (KY) 0.7411
26 St. Thomas (FL) 0.7407
27 SUNY Geneseo (NY) 0.7365
28 Montclair State (NJ) 0.7348
29 Siena Heights (MI) 0.7279
30 Wingate (NC) 0.7221
31 Huntingdon (AL) 0.7158
32 Irvine Valley (CA) 0.7154
33 St. Joseph's (NY - Long Island) 0.7146
34 Oxnard (CA) 0.71
35 Webber International (FL) 0.701
36 Purdue Northwest (IN) 0.6994
37 SUNY Brockport (NY) 0.6938
38 Barton (NC) 0.6895
39 St. Thomas Aquinas (NY) 0.6819
40 La Sierra (CA) 0.6681
41 Marian (WI) 0.6583
42 Campbellsville (KY) 0.6551
43 Cypress (CA) 0.6515
44 Bryant & Stratton (NY - Albany) 0.6503
45 Midland (NE) 0.6463
46 Lees-McRae (NC) 0.6428
47 Bryant & Stratton (WI) 0.6424
48 Mercyhurst (PA) 0.6408
49 Thomas (GA) 0.6379
50 Post (CT) 0.6274
51 UW-Stout (WI) 0.6203
52 Southwestern (KS) 0.6068
53 Illinois Wesleyan (IL) 0.6049
54 Graceland (IA) 0.5897
55 PennWest California (PA) 0.5887
56 Arizona Christian (AZ) 0.5792
57 Pratt CC (KS) 0.5652
58 Emmanuel (GA) 0.5551
59 Mount Olive (NC) 0.5371
60 Redlands (CA) 0.5281
61 Norco (CA) 0.5187
62 Neumann (PA) 0.5145
63 Holy Family (PA) 0.5012
64 Cairn (PA) 0.5003
Please note: Previous RPIs used a point differential system which has been removed in order to avoid encouraging running up the score on new teams- especially those in their first year competing. This is the same reason that only teams rated .500 (in a 0-1 system) are displayed. This is Wins, losses, WP, OWP, OOWP according to WCFFB weights for value.
CLUB TOP 25
BASED ON RESULTS AS REPORTED
Please note: Previous RPIs used a point differential system which has been removed in order to avoid encouraging running up the score on new teams- especially those in their first year competing. This is Wins, losses, WP, OWP, OOWP according to WCFFB weights for value.
Rank Team Final RPI
1 UCF (FL) 0.827
2 Florida (FL) 0.8065
3 Florida State (FL) 0.7595
4 Florida Atlantic (FL) 0.7534
5 Georgia (GA) 0.7341
6 Fayetteville State (NC) 0.7262
7 Winston-Salem State (NC) 0.7113
8 Rutgers (NJ) 0.7088
9 Wagner (NY) 0.6815
10 Arizona State (AZ) 0.6424
11 Texas Southern (TX) 0.6067
12 Delaware (DE) 0.5809
13 South Florida (FL) 0.5777
14 Virginia Union (VA) 0.5686
15 Tampa (FL) 0.5648
16 Staten Island (NY) 0.5511
17 UCLA (CA) 0.5202
18 Saint Leo (FL) 0.5199
19 SUNY Cortland (NY) 0.511
20 Franciscan (OH) 0.4994
21 Santa Barbara CC (CA) 0.494
22 Clemson (SC) 0.4478
23 Florida International (FL) 0.4409
24 Saint Joseph's (PA) 0.4407
25 USC (CA) 0.4394
PLEASE READ: A unique challenge in Women’s College Flag Football is that so many types of colleges at varying competition levels are competing across the country. Teams compete across divisions and conferences. Here at WCFFB, we decided to collect all of the reliable data we could to develop a comprehensive rating system for all teams competing across the country. Teams report their wins and losses differently, but we do our best to evaluate their records. We value wins over +.500 teams as key wins, total wins, and win % to develop our ranking. Only the teams with a composite RPI rating above .500 are displayed out of respect for teams competing, sometimes in their first season.. The RPI represented here is solely the opinion of Women’s College Flag Football .com. As always, please submit any scores, data or corrections through the contact page.
